Print E-mail
Volume 43, Number 2, April 2010

Comparison of Clinical Features Between Coxsackievirus A2 and Enterovirus 71 During the Enterovirus Outbreak in Taiwan, 2008: A Children’s Hospital Experience


Shih-Perng Chen, Yhu-Chering Huang, Wen-Chen Lia, Cheng-Hsun Chiua, Chung-Guei Huang, Kuo-Chien Tsao, Tzou-Yien Lin


Received: April 28, 2009    Revised: June 1, 2009    Accepted: June 15, 2009   

 

Corresponding author:

Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Children’s Medical Center, 5 Fu-Shin Street, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan, Taiwan. 

E-mail: ychuang@adm.cgmh.org.tw 


 

Background and purpose: 

Coxsackievirus A2 (Cox A2) was the predominant serotype in the enterovirus outbreak in Taiwan, 2008. However, detailed clinical features of Cox A2 infection have not been reported. In this study, we compared Cox A2 with enterovirus 71 (EV71) in terms of clinical manifestation and epidemiology during the 2008 enterovirus outbreak in Taiwan. 



 

Methods:

A total of 280 hospitalized patients (97 with culture-proven EV71 infection and 183 with culture-proven Cox A2 infection) in 2008 at the Chang Gung Children’s Medical Center were enrolled in this study. Epidemiologic data, clinical manifestations, and outcomes for these patients were collected and compared. 



 

Results:

 Both Cox A2 and EV71 serotypes peaked in June and declined soon afterwards. Seventy-one per-cent of the patients were younger than 3 years of age. Both groups had the same male-to-female ratio of 1.6:1. Patients with EV71 infection had a significantly longer hospitalization period (4.1 vs. 3.0 days, p< 0.001). Fever, fever for more than 3 days with a temperature above 39.C, lethargy, poor activity, poor appetite and a myoclonic jerk were significantly associated with EV71 infection. Fever, or fever with a temperature above 39.C, febrile seizure, elevated white cell counts, and elevated serum C-reactive protein concentrations were signifi-cantly associated with Cox A2 infection. Most patients with EV71 infection presented with hand-foot-mouth disease (78.3%), while most Cox A2-infected patients presented with herpangina (83.6%). Central nervous system complications were found in 18.6% of EV71-infected children, but only in 1.1% of Cox A2-infected children. All the patients with Cox A2 infection showed total recovery. One patient with EV71 infection died from encephalitis with cardiopulmonary failure, and 6.2% of EV71-infected children had neurologic sequelae



 

Conclusion:

Both Cox A2 and EV71 serotypes accounted for the enterovirus outbreak in Taiwanese children in 2008. Compared with those infected by EV71, the children with Cox A2 infection mostly pre-sented with herpangina, had fewer central nervous system complications, and had better overall outcome.



 

Key words:

coxsackievirus A2, encephalitis, enterovirus 71, hand-foot-and-mouth disease, herpangina