Print E-mail
Volume 39, Number 6, December 2006

Journal impact factor in the era of expanding literature


Julia Andersen, John Belmont, Cheng T. Cho
Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Received: July 20, 2006       Accepted: October 25, 2006   

 

Corresponding author:

Dr. Cheng T. Cho, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA. E-mail: ccho@kumc.edu This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

 



 

Methods:

The Journal Citation Reports (JCR) of the Science Citation Index (SCI), published by the Institute of Scientific Information (ISI), provides a comprehensive database for analysis of journals. Recent use of JCR’s journal impact factor for evaluation of journals and authors has provoked strongly mixed reactions among investigators. This paper examines the effects of the rapidly expanding literature on the impact factor over the past decade and examines the limitations of journal impact factor for evaluating individual author’s contributions. The JCR analyzed 6088 journals in 2005, a 32% increase in new listings since 1995. During the same period, there was a 39% increase in new journal listings in the infectious diseases category. The phenomenon of journal proliferation has had a profound effect on the journal impact factor. During the past decade an increased impact factor was observed in 92% of the top ranking major journals, especially in young and rapidly expanding research fields. Certain highly cited new journals published primarily review articles — not original contributions. There was no increase in impact factor among some of the best known journals, such as Journal of Experimental Medicine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), and Journal of Infectious Diseases. Clearly, journal impact factor is an imperfect tool for measuring the quality of articles, and its use in evaluating authors has inherent risks. In spite of its limitations, journal impact factor can be used as a rough indicator of scientific quality in specific subject categories and for serious reading and learning.

 



 

Key words:

Abstracting and indexing, bibliographic, bibliometrics, biomedical research, communicable diseases, databases

 



 

J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2006;39:436-443.