Print E-mail
Volume 40, Number 4, August 2007

An outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in patients of a pediatric intensive care unit and high carriage rate among health care workers


Yu-Chen Lin, Tsai-Ling Lauderdale, Hui-Min Lin, Pei-Chen Chen, Ming-Fang Cheng, Kai-Sheng Hsieh, Yung-Ching Liu
Department of Pediatrics, Veterans General Hospital-Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung; Division of Clinical Research, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan; Department of Dermatology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei; Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei; Section of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, and Section of Microbiology, Veterans General Hospital-Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Received: April 20, 2006    Revised: July 30, 2006    Accepted: August 12, 2006   

 

Corresponding author:

Dr. Yung-Ching Liu, MD, Section of Infectious Disease, Veterans General Hospital-Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung, 386, Ta-chung 1st Rd, Kaohsiung 81346, Taiwan. E-mail: ycliu@isca.vghks.gov.tw This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it ; yuchlin@yahoo.com.tw This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

 



 

Background and purpose: 

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been the leading cause of nosocomial infections in many hospitals. To investigate the impact of carriage by health care workers (HCWs) on patient transmission, surveillance culture was performed following an outbreak of MRSA in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

 



 

Methods:

Isolates from 61 HCWs and 10 environmental sites were collected. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and antibiogram analysis were performed to determine the clonal relationship between isolates and potential routes of transmission.

 



 

Results:

The overall carriage rate of HCWs was 67.2% (41/61) for S. aureus and 26.2% (16/61) for MRSA. One MRSA was isolated from the 10 environmental sites sampled. Two major MRSA clusters were identified based on the PFGE patterns. Isolates with indistinguishable PFGE patterns (pulsotype A) were found in all patient isolates from the outbreak, from several HCWs plus the environmental isolate; all were resistant to ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Interestingly, the isolate from a patient who had prolonged hospitalization in PICU had PFGE patterns (pulsotype B) distinct from the strains involved in the outbreak. This strain was susceptible to ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and was also found in several HCWs. Thus, there appeared to be 2 main MRSA clones circulating in the PICU of our hospital.

 



 

Conclusion:

Person-to-person and environment-to-person (or vice versa) transmissions are documented in this study. Strict hand washing before and after patient contact must be enforced and closely monitored, as it is the principal preventive measure in containing the spread of MRSA. To prevent the emergence of vancomycin-resistant MRSA and the further transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms, implementation of periodic and routine active surveillance cultures as part of infection control measures may also be evaluated.

 



 

Key words:

Carrier state; Cross infection; Infection control; Staphylococcus aureus



 

J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2007;40:325-334.